UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

men St Anselm 2
  
St Anselm             
W-L: (12- 1) PR = 97.3719

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 302 A Frostburg State ECC ( 7- 9, 91.0) 11- 7 308 H Bentley NE10 ( 8- 6, 94.6) 10- 6 315 H Mercy ECC (10- 4, 93.6) 18-14 318 A Bentley NE10 ( 8- 6, 94.6) 16- 8 322 A Franklin Pierce NE10 ( 2-10, 89.2) 10- 2 328 H Assumption NE10 (10- 4, 94.0) 7- 6 402 A St Michaels NE10 ( 7- 6, 91.6) 15- 8 405 H Adelphi NE10 (15- 1, 99.1) 9- 6 409 H American International NE10 ( 2-11, 87.6) 19- 6 416 H Southern New Hampshire NE10 ( 5- 9, 91.1) 10- 7 419 A Pace NE10 (11- 4, 95.7) 16-11 430 H Bentley NE10 ( 8- 6, 94.6) 10- 9 503 H Adelphi NE10 (15- 1, 99.1) 12-13 507 H Bentley NE10 ( 8- 6, 94.6)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   302 A Frostburg State        11- 7       4     6          -1.00
   308 H Bentley                10- 6       4     3           0.57
   315 H Mercy                  18-14       4     4          -0.47
   318 A Bentley                16- 8       8     2    +      2.86
   322 A Franklin Pierce        10- 2       8     8           0.00
   328 H Assumption              7- 6       1     4    -     -3.00
   402 A St Michaels            15- 8       7     5           0.00
   405 H Adelphi                 9- 6       3    -1    ++     4.07
   409 H American International 19- 6      13    10           0.00
   416 H Southern New Hampshire 10- 7       3     7    -     -2.00
   419 A Pace                   16-11       5     1    +      3.95
   430 H Bentley                10- 9       1     3    -     -2.43
   503 H Adelphi                12-13      -1    -1           0.07

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   328 H Assumption              7- 6       1     4    -     -3.00
   416 H Southern New Hampshire 10- 7       3     7    -     -2.00
   430 H Bentley                10- 9       1     3    -     -2.43

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   405 H Adelphi                 9- 6       3    -1    ++     4.07
   318 A Bentley                16- 8       8     2    +      2.86
   419 A Pace                   16-11       5     1    +      3.95

St Anselm Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adams State St Anselm   St Anselm
Adelphi Adelphi tied - ( 8- 0) ( 8- 0) Adelphi
Alabama-Huntsville St Anselm   St Anselm
American International St Anselm St Anselm  
Anderson (SC) St Anselm   St Anselm
Assumption St Anselm St Anselm  
Barton St Anselm   St Anselm
Belmont Abbey St Anselm   St Anselm
Bentley St Anselm St Anselm  
Bridgeport St Anselm St Anselm   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Caldwell St Anselm St Anselm   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Catawba St Anselm   St Anselm
Chestnut Hill St Anselm insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Anselm
Chowan St Anselm   St Anselm
Coker St Anselm   St Anselm
Colorado Mesa St Anselm   St Anselm
Concordia-Irvine St Anselm insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) St Anselm
D'Youville St Anselm St Anselm   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Davenport St Anselm   St Anselm
Davis & Elkins St Anselm insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Anselm
District of Columbia St Anselm St Anselm   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Dominican (CA) St Anselm insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) St Anselm
Dominican (NY) St Anselm St Anselm   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Embry-Riddle St Anselm   St Anselm
Emmanuel (GA) St Anselm   St Anselm
Emory & Henry St Anselm   St Anselm
Felician St Anselm St Anselm   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Flagler St Anselm   St Anselm
Florida Southern St Anselm   St Anselm
Florida Tech St Anselm insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Anselm
Franklin Pierce St Anselm St Anselm  
Frostburg State St Anselm St Anselm  
Georgian Court St Anselm St Anselm   5- 1 vs 1- 4
Holy Family St Anselm   St Anselm
Indianapolis St Anselm   St Anselm
Lake Erie St Anselm   St Anselm
Lander St Anselm   St Anselm
Lees-McRae St Anselm   St Anselm
Lenoir-Rhyne St Anselm   St Anselm
Lewis St Anselm   St Anselm
Limestone Limestone   Limestone
Lincoln Memorial St Anselm   St Anselm
Lynn St Anselm tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) St Anselm
Malone St Anselm insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Anselm
Mars Hill St Anselm   St Anselm
Maryville St Anselm   St Anselm
Mercy St Anselm St Anselm  
Molloy St Anselm St Anselm   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Montevallo St Anselm   St Anselm
Mount Olive St Anselm   St Anselm
Newberry St Anselm   St Anselm
North Greenville St Anselm   St Anselm
Northwood St Anselm   St Anselm
Pace St Anselm St Anselm  
Palm Beach Atlantic St Anselm   St Anselm
Post St Anselm insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) St Anselm
Quincy St Anselm   St Anselm
Roberts Wesleyan St Anselm St Anselm   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Rockhurst St Anselm   St Anselm
Rollins St Anselm insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) St Anselm
Seton Hill Seton Hill tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Seton Hill
Shorter St Anselm   St Anselm
Southern New Hampshire St Anselm St Anselm  
St Leo St Anselm   St Anselm
St Michaels St Anselm St Anselm  
St Thomas Aquinas St Anselm St Anselm   4- 1 vs 1- 3
Tampa Tampa   Tampa
Thomas More St Anselm   St Anselm
Tiffin St Anselm   St Anselm
Tusculum St Anselm   St Anselm
Virginia State St Anselm   St Anselm
Walsh St Anselm tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) St Anselm
Westminster (UT) St Anselm   St Anselm
Wheeling St Anselm insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Anselm
William Jewell St Anselm   St Anselm
Wilmington (DE) St Anselm insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) St Anselm
Wingate St Anselm   St Anselm
Young Harris St Anselm   St Anselm

PowerWise = 74


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.61

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Frostburg Stat  ( 7- 9, 91.0)    11- 7       -8.87      16.22       0.64         1.12            18.95
   0 H Bentley         ( 8- 6, 94.6)    10- 6       -5.31      19.78      -0.64         1.12            21.50
   0 H Mercy           (10- 4, 93.6)    18-14       -6.35      18.75      -0.64         1.12            20.34
   0 A Bentley         ( 8- 6, 94.6)    16- 8       -5.31      19.78       0.64         1.12            22.95
   0 A Franklin Pierc  ( 2-10, 89.2)    10- 2      -10.68      14.42       0.64         1.12            16.92
   0 H Assumption      (10- 4, 94.0)     7- 6       -5.88      19.21      -0.64         1.12            20.87
   0 A St Michaels     ( 7- 6, 91.6)    15- 8       -8.26      16.84       0.64         1.12            19.65
   0 H Adelphi         (15- 1, 99.1)     9- 6       -0.82      24.28      -0.64         1.12            26.56
   0 H American Inter  ( 2-11, 87.6)    19- 6      -12.25      12.85      -0.64         1.12            13.71
   0 H Southern New H  ( 5- 9, 91.1)    10- 7       -8.80      16.29      -0.64         1.12            17.58
   0 A Pace            (11- 4, 95.7)    16-11       -4.23      20.87       0.64         1.12            24.17
   0 H Bentley         ( 8- 6, 94.6)    10- 9       -5.31      19.78      -0.64         1.12            21.50
   0 H Adelphi         (15- 1, 99.1)    12-13       -0.82      24.28      -0.64         1.12            -1.64
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       243.07

winning pts = 244.7142 losing points = -1.6415

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------